Poll finds huge support for reducing golf driving distances

Alistair Dunsmuir
By Alistair Dunsmuir September 14, 2020 06:56

A survey of golf course designers across the world has found almost unanimous support for measures to reduce hitting distances in golf.

The European Institute of Golf Course Architects (EIGCA) poll of its members, which includes several course designers who aren’t based in Europe, found that the increasing lengths golfers are driving the ball is having a negative impact on the game for a range of reasons including safety, the environment, ‘land grab’ and threats to the integrity of historic courses.

Ninety-five percent of architects said some form action now needs to be taken.

“We surveyed the EIGCA membership for their thoughts on a range of factors relating to increased hitting distances, forged through their experience of designing golf courses around the world. The most eye-catching result is that 95 percent of respondents agreed that action needs to be taken to reduce hitting distances,” said Christoph Städler, president of EIGCA.

Paul Lawrie, after a drive. (Photo by Phil Inglis/Getty Images)


“The vast majority of respondents, 75 percent, believed that increasing ball flight length and advances in equipment technology are diminishing the skill of the game which is leading to a simplification of golf course strategy. Eighty-eight percent of respondents considered a reduction in driving distance of between 10 and 15 percent would be appropriate.”

The survey also showed that 34 percent of EIGCA members felt that any action to reduce hitting distances should only be applied to tournament professionals, whilst 62 percent thought that amateurs should be largely spared any regulatory effects. Importantly, 76 percent thought that hitting distances were having a negative impact on golf course design.

Summing up the results, Städler commented: “Golf course architects are clearly concerned about a number of factors influenced by hitting distances, including safety, negative impacts on the environment, land grab and threats to the integrity of historic courses. Reducing hitting distances could lead to shorter courses which are quicker to play, cheaper to maintain, need less land, are more sustainable, more accessible and potentially more profitable. At a time when we are looking to increase player participation surely these should be our objectives.

Jon Rahm

“By the clever use of design, skilled golf course architects are able to achieve a certain balance between the challenge for the best players and fun and playability for weaker and shorter players. With ever increasing hitting distances, this becomes increasingly difficult.”


Alistair Dunsmuir
By Alistair Dunsmuir September 14, 2020 06:56
Write a comment


  1. Pete USA September 14, 21:08

    We’ve been manufacturing & promoting “Hybrid” Mid-distance golf balls for shorter Par 3, Executive & Mid-Length courses since 1990. The ball has been adjusted to the correct length & weight, allowing smaller courses to play like big courses…with use of all clubs…but in half the time & cost with less difficulty! Substantually reduces the course land-use, construction expense and is eco-compliant.

    Reply to this comment
  2. Peter September 14, 18:35

    Would be smart !! In the 90’s, developers of all sorts were creating courses that were too long, too tough and too challenging !! Playability is important and since most “golfers” play along the ground, reducing driving distances would be a consideration, as would hazards !!

    Reply to this comment
View comments

Write a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*

Join Our Mailing List

Read the latest issues

Advertise With Us

To advertise in the magazine or online, contact:

Email marketing@thegolfbusiness.co.uk
Tel 020 7803 2453

Twitter Timeline